Loading…
Loading…
RB · Stanford
53 checkable claims from 28 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Christian McCaffrey, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 96% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bullish than 54% of the room, across 2 articles · 88.3 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 83% of the room, across 2 articles · 71.9 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 62% of the room, across 13 articles · 79.2 accuracy on him (2 settled)
Page 1 of 2 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
Not settled yet. These are graded once the season or event they describe has finished.
“So Christian McCaffrey, Kyle Youssek locked in. Kalyn Black locked in. Jordan James locked in.”
“So I'm going to take some risk here when the running backs fall off. And I'm going to say Christian McCaffrey... is a draft”
“he is a reluctant draft and the injury risk is absolutely terrifying”
“I'm a pass at seven. Yeah, I was into fourteen. I was curious at twelve, at ten maybe, but at seven, I don't know. I'm out there.”
“If McCaffrey is healthy, he is going to smash... Yeah, I mean I love to wait till the second but he's right around that one two turn for me.”
“I love taking him in the second round... and I love getting the discount. Round two”
“McCaffrey is not a risk worth taking because when your shark, your emphasis in the first two rounds should be on avoiding the bear traps”
“It's Christian McCaffrey. It is. No question.”