Loading…
Loading…
RB · Stanford
53 checkable claims from 28 pundits. These are other people’s predictions about what he will do — we grade the prediction, never the player.
Each pundit’s standing lean on Christian McCaffrey, measured against every other pundit who made a comparable call — same kind of claim, same season. +100 would mean the most bullish voice in every room; −100 the most bearish. At least two articles per pundit before a lean is shown, and the accuracy is how that pundit’s settled calls about him have graded out. A lean is a fact about the pundit, never a judgment of the player.
more bullish than 96% of the room, across 2 articles · on him not settled yet
more bullish than 54% of the room, across 2 articles · 88.3 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 83% of the room, across 2 articles · 71.9 accuracy on him (2 settled)
more bearish than 62% of the room, across 13 articles · 79.2 accuracy on him (2 settled)
Page 2 of 2 — unsettled claims first, then the settled ones, newest first.
“And might be your front runner for offensive player of the year”
“Christian McCaffrey gets a highly deserved comeback player of the year award”
“CMC is back plus all the injuries means the top five MVP season is coming”
“Well, McCaffrey last year should've won it.”
“Christian McCaffrey should win. Often to play the year over JSN”
“I have Christian McCaffrey at RB four. I've had him at RB four. I'm going to keep him at RB four.”
“For me, he's a boom. He's my RB five. I initially had him lower in my rankings this offseason, but I have moved him up”
“3. Panthers RB Christian McCaffrey (2 votes: Jennings, Mornhinweg)”
“3. Panthers RB Christian McCaffrey (2 votes: Jennings, Mornhinweg)”
“Christian McCaffrey ... 586.4 4.5”
“Christian McCaffrey ... 86.2 69.0 586.4 4.5”
“Christian McCaffrey ... 1,276.7 10.6”
“Christian McCaffrey SF RB ... 266.0 1,276.7 10.6”