Skip to main content

Jordan Dajani#23 of 87 NFL pundits · Sep 18, 2026

Dajani has New England edging Pittsburgh 16-13 and the Rams beating the Giants 30-21 on a late field goal.

Published in writing · CBS SportsRead the original

0 of 2calls landed2 close calls · all settled
67.9Average accuracyout of 100, across 2 calls
54.1A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
2Games calledeveryone’s picks below
#23Jordan Dajani’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What Jordan Dajani said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
I have the Rams bouncing back and covering with a late field goal.
Jordan Dajani, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was published
CBS Sports
The piece
NFL Week 2 odds, predictions, expert picks: Can blitz-heavy Vikings overtake Bears? Will Cards upset Seahawks?
The original
Read the original
  1. SaidSep 18
  2. PlayedSep 20–21
  3. GradedSep 21–22
  1. 1Los Angeles Rams 30 — Giants 21“Jordan Dajani on why he has the Rams covering, 30-21.”
  2. 2New England Patriots 16 — Steelers 13“Jordan Dajani on why he likes the Steelers to cover against the Patriots but has New England pulling out the 16-13 victory.”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Los Angeles Rams 30 — Giants 211Score PredictionsRams 28–669.0550+36.95
New England Patriots 16 — Steelers 132Score PredictionsPatriots 20–366.6758.29+16.24
2 calls · 2 close calls · all settled67.954.1

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

2 checkable claims — 2 score predictions — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 2 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

All 2 have settled, averaging 67.9 out of 100, against 54.1 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

  1. 1Score PredictionsLos Angeles Rams

    Los Angeles Rams 30 — Giants 21

    What happenedRams 28–6called Rams by 9 · won by 22
    69.05Close · naive 50
    69.05this call50a naive guess19.05better than naive1.94difficulty+36.95skill

    Closing line (Sep 21): Rams by 6.5, total 47.5 · this 30–21 calls a bigger Rams win (by 9) and more points (51). Graded on the margin called, not on the spread.

    How this was scored
    score:
    6-28
    skill:
    36.95
    they picked:
    LAR
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    69.05
    baseline:
    50
    difficulty:
    1.94
    weeks in the season:
    18
    actual margin:
    22
    weeks left when called:
    17
    naive home margin:
    0.19
    predicted margin:
    9
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Score PredictionsNew England Patriots

    New England Patriots 16 — Steelers 13

    What happenedPatriots 20–3called Patriots by 3 · won by 17
    66.67Close · naive 58.29

    Closing line (Sep 20): Patriots by 4.5, total 41.5 · this 16–13 calls a closer game (Patriots by 3) and fewer points (29). Graded on the margin called, not on the spread.

    How this was scored
    score:
    3-20
    skill:
    16.24
    they picked:
    NE
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    66.67
    baseline:
    58.29
    difficulty:
    1.94
    weeks in the season:
    18
    actual margin:
    17
    weeks left when called:
    17
    naive home margin:
    −0.52
    predicted margin:
    3
    Think this is wrong?
  3. All

    The take as a whole

    the average of 2 settled calls, each counted once

    67.9naive 54.1

The games in this take

every pundit’s pick on each

Others on the same people

More score predictions

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.