Skip to main content

Colin Cowherd#54 of 87 NFL pundits · Sep 22, 2026

Cowherd revealed their Week 2 Herd Hierarchy top-10 NFL power rankings, putting the Seahawks back at No. 1 ahead of the Bills. They also reaffirmed their pick of the Saints to win their division and suggested Buffalo would handle the Chargers.

Published in writing · Fox SportsRead the original

1 of 1calls landed1 hit · 2 waiting
100Average accuracyout of 100, across 1 call
100A naive guessthe same calls, no knowledge
1Games calledeveryone’s picks below
#54Colin Cowherd’s rankof 87 ranked NFL pundits

What Colin Cowherd said

our reading, beside the words we read it from
Only Seattle can go to a backup [quarterback] — a backup most of us don't love — and throttle teams.
Colin Cowherd, the lead quote · each call’s own words are below
Where it was published
Fox Sports
The piece
Herd Hierarchy: Are The Bills The NFL's Best Team, Or Do Seahawks Remain No. 1?
The original
Read the original
  1. SaidSep 22
  2. PlayedSep 27
  3. GradedSep 28
  1. 1Buffalo Bills to beat Los Angeles Chargers“They're facing the Los Angeles Chargers this week; good luck to Los Angeles there.”
  2. 2New Orleans Saints to win the division“They have a real roster. We picked them to win their division.”
  3. 3Power Rankings“Here are Cowherd's Week 2 Herd Hierarchy rankings: 10. Detroit Lions ... 1. Seattle Seahawks”

Box score

HitCloseMissWaiting
VerdictCallKindWhat happenedScoreNaiveSkill
Buffalo Bills to beat Los Angeles Chargers1Game Outcome PicksBills 24–161001000
New Orleans Saints to win the division2Division Winners————
“Here are Cowherd's Week 2 Herd Hierarchy rankings: 10. Detroit…”3Power Rankings————
3 calls · 1 hit · 2 waiting100100

Game calls show that game’s closing betting line under their grade: a dated fact from nflverse, for context and never part of a grade. MissedTakes takes no bets and earns nothing from any sportsbook.

How each call scored

a naive guessbetter than naive

3 checkable claims — 1 division winner, 1 game outcome pick and 1 power ranking — each graded on its own rather than as one all-or-nothing call.

It names 2 players and teams, each linked to their own record.

1 of 3 have settled so far, averaging 100 out of 100, against 100 for a naive guess at the same calls.

Each call is scored 0 to 100 against what happened, on its own, by the published methodology. The naive guess is what knowing nothing would have scored on the same calls; the gap, weighted by how hard the call was, is the skill.

  1. 1Game Outcome PicksBuffalo Bills

    Buffalo Bills to beat Los Angeles Chargers

    What happenedBills 24–16Chargers at Bills
    100Hit · naive 100
    100this call100a naive guess0better than naive1.89difficulty0skill

    Closing line (Sep 27): Bills by 7 · favorite pick, Bills about 3 in 4 (73%).

    How this was scored
    won:
    BUF
    score:
    16-24
    skill:
    0
    they picked:
    BUF
    season:
    2026
    accuracy:
    100
    baseline:
    100
    the naive pick:
    BUF
    difficulty:
    1.89
    weeks in the season:
    18
    weeks left when called:
    16
    Think this is wrong?
  2. 2Division WinnersNew Orleans Saints

    New Orleans Saints to win the division

    VerdictWaiting

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

  3. 3Power Rankings

    “Here are Cowherd's Week 2 Herd Hierarchy rankings: 10. Detroit Lions ... 1. Seattle Seahawks”

    VerdictWaiting

    Not settled yet. This is graded once the result is in.

The game in this take

every pundit’s pick on each

Others on the same people

More division winners

The same kind of call, about other players and teams.