How often NFL pundits hedge — and whether their hedges land
A hedge is the “probably”, the “could”, the “I wouldn’t be surprised if” wrapped around a call. We grade the call inside it either way. This page counts how often each pundit hedges, and compares how often their hedged calls and their plain calls come true. As of 2026-10-11.
- Pundits listed
- 171
- Claims hedged
- 23.2%
- Hedges undersell them
- 14
- Doubt was real
- 12
30+ claims read
across those pundits
right more often hedging
right more often committing
Hedged calls against plain calls
Hedging against accuracy
Also here: Brendon Nelson · Hedged 56.25% of 35 claims read
Also here: Rafael Zamorano · Hedged 33.95% of 65 claims read
Also here: Jeremy Pargo · Hedged 0% of 33 claims read
How often pundits hedge
Pundits in each band
Are they right more often when they hedge?
Accuracy on graded hedged calls against graded plain ones, for every pundit with at least 10 of the first and 20 of the second. Without hedging says whether their plain calls are more or less accurate than their hedged ones — “Same Accuracy” when the two are within five points. The gap is amber where the hedged calls land more often, blue where the plain ones do, gray inside those five points.
| Pundit | Hedged | Plain | Gap | Without hedging |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1John Breech | 92.59% (11) | 48.97% (108) | +43.6 | Less Accurate |
| 2Alain Poupart | 100% (10) | 71.98% (81) | +28 | Less Accurate |
| 3Albert Breer | 76.08% (10) | 51.79% (23) | +24.3 | Less Accurate |
| 4Manti Te'o | 58.33% (10) | 35.5% (55) | +22.8 | Less Accurate |
| 5David Harrison | 80.98% (13) | 60.67% (222) | +20.3 | Less Accurate |
| 6Chris Brockman | 73.29% (56) | 55.16% (229) | +18.1 | Less Accurate |
| 7Kyle Brandt | 72.81% (14) | 55.06% (91) | +17.8 | Less Accurate |
| 8Ross Jackson | 69.77% (38) | 53.23% (194) | +16.5 | Less Accurate |
| 9Andrew Erickson | 72.82% (23) | 58.26% (79) | +14.6 | Less Accurate |
| 10Nick Wright | 65.13% (64) | 51.97% (313) | +13.2 | Less Accurate |
| 11John Middlekauff | 66.53% (42) | 54.03% (63) | +12.5 | Less Accurate |
| 12Pat Fitzmaurice | 73.62% (29) | 62.69% (95) | +10.9 | Less Accurate |
| 13Richard Sherman | 66.15% (36) | 56.41% (101) | +9.7 | Less Accurate |
| 14Danny Parkins | 60.15% (15) | 55.1% (82) | +5 | Less Accurate |
| 15Gregg Rosenthal | 62.81% (74) | 60.15% (241) | +2.7 | Same Accuracy |
| 16Rich Eisen | 61.38% (99) | 60.57% (361) | +0.8 | Same Accuracy |
| 17Peter Schrager | 71.36% (14) | 71.58% (34) | -0.2 | Same Accuracy |
| 18Jeff Kerr | 80.39% (31) | 80.95% (152) | -0.6 | Same Accuracy |
| 19JP Acosta | 57.47% (22) | 60.87% (118) | -3.4 | Same Accuracy |
| 20Colin Cowherd | 54.19% (63) | 57.91% (351) | -3.7 | Same Accuracy |
| 21Matt Miller | 75.94% (10) | 85.69% (42) | -9.7 | More Accurate |
| 22Tyler Sullivan | 49% (18) | 59.59% (61) | -10.6 | More Accurate |
| 23Marcus Mosher | 76.72% (48) | 88.25% (29) | -11.5 | More Accurate |
| 24Bucky Brooks | 69.72% (16) | 82.13% (101) | -12.4 | More Accurate |
| 25Daniel Jeremiah | 61.69% (42) | 75.42% (234) | -13.7 | More Accurate |
How often they hedge
The share of each pundit’s claims that carried a hedge, averaged by article like every number on this site, for pundits with at least 30 claims read. The kinds: leans (“probably”, “likely”); possibilities (“could”, “might”); long shots (“wouldn’t shock me”); toss-ups (“50-50”); conditions (“if he stays healthy”).
| Pundit | Hedged | Claims read | Kinds |
|---|---|---|---|
| 126Mitchell Eisenstein | 20.83% | 78 | leans 4, long shots 2, possibilities 1, conditions 1 |
| 127Mel Kiper | 20.41% | 104 | leans 5, possibilities 3, conditions 1 |
| 128David Harrison | 20.22% | 376 | leans 27, possibilities 19, conditions 10, long shots 1 |
| 129Brooke Cersosimo | 20% | 34 | conditions 1 |
| 130Chris Long | 19.89% | 36 | possibilities 4, leans 2, conditions 2 |
| 131Kyle Brandt | 19.57% | 114 | leans 8, possibilities 7, conditions 1, long shots 1 |
| 132Chris Brockman | 19.5% | 494 | leans 40, possibilities 28, conditions 16, toss-ups 4, long shots 1 |
| 133Gavin Carlson | 19.23% | 30 | leans 1, possibilities 1, conditions 1 |
| 134Ryan Reynolds | 18.18% | 71 | conditions 2, leans 1, possibilities 1 |
| 135Danny Parkins | 18.15% | 254 | leans 14, possibilities 14, conditions 6 |
| 136Kent Swanson | 17.61% | 54 | leans 4, possibilities 3, conditions 1 |
| 137Manti Te'o | 17.36% | 66 | leans 8, possibilities 1, conditions 1 |
| 138Gennaro Filice | 16.67% | 35 | leans 1 |
| 139Cynthia Frelund | 16.24% | 104 | possibilities 5, leans 4, toss-ups 2 |
| 140Jesse Holley | 16.07% | 33 | leans 1, possibilities 1, conditions 1 |
| 141Seth Walder | 16% | 41 | possibilities 3, leans 1 |
| 142Jake Ciely | 15.99% | 141 | possibilities 15, conditions 8, leans 6 |
| 143Kevin Wildes | 15.63% | 60 | possibilities 3, leans 2 |
| 144Jeff Cavanaugh | 15.52% | 101 | leans 6, possibilities 3, conditions 2 |
| 145Brady Quinn | 15.43% | 113 | leans 2, possibilities 2, conditions 2 |
| 146Todd McShay | 15.32% | 44 | leans 6, conditions 3, possibilities 1 |
| 147Jourdan Rodrigue | 15.25% | 106 | leans 8, possibilities 6, conditions 3 |
| 148Kyle Crabbs | 14.29% | 327 | leans 1 |
| 149LaVar Arrington | 14.29% | 44 | leans 3, possibilities 1 |
| 150Jordan Reid | 14.29% | 41 | leans 1, conditions 1 |
How a hedge is read, and why a hedged call is still graded as the call it wraps: the methodology, Amendment 21.