How often NFL pundits hedge — and whether their hedges land
A hedge is the “probably”, the “could”, the “I wouldn’t be surprised if” wrapped around a call. We grade the call inside it either way. This page counts how often each pundit hedges, and compares how often their hedged calls and their plain calls come true. As of 2026-10-10.
- Pundits listed
- 171
- Claims hedged
- 23.2%
- Hedges undersell them
- 14
- Doubt was real
- 12
30+ claims read
across those pundits
right more often hedging
right more often committing
Hedged calls against plain calls
Hedging against accuracy
Also here: Brendon Nelson · Hedged 56.25% of 35 claims read
Also here: Rafael Zamorano · Hedged 33.95% of 65 claims read
Also here: Jeremy Pargo · Hedged 0% of 33 claims read
How often pundits hedge
Pundits in each band
Are they right more often when they hedge?
Accuracy on graded hedged calls against graded plain ones, for every pundit with at least 10 of the first and 20 of the second. Without hedging says whether their plain calls are more or less accurate than their hedged ones — “Same Accuracy” when the two are within five points. The gap is amber where the hedged calls land more often, blue where the plain ones do, gray inside those five points.
| Pundit | Hedged | Plain | Gap | Without hedging |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1John Breech | 92.59% (11) | 48.97% (108) | +43.6 | Less Accurate |
| 2Alain Poupart | 100% (10) | 71.98% (81) | +28 | Less Accurate |
| 3Albert Breer | 76.08% (10) | 51.79% (23) | +24.3 | Less Accurate |
| 4Manti Te'o | 58.33% (10) | 35.5% (55) | +22.8 | Less Accurate |
| 5David Harrison | 80.98% (13) | 60.67% (222) | +20.3 | Less Accurate |
| 6Chris Brockman | 73.29% (56) | 55.16% (229) | +18.1 | Less Accurate |
| 7Kyle Brandt | 72.81% (14) | 55.06% (91) | +17.8 | Less Accurate |
| 8Ross Jackson | 69.77% (38) | 53.23% (194) | +16.5 | Less Accurate |
| 9Andrew Erickson | 72.82% (23) | 58.26% (79) | +14.6 | Less Accurate |
| 10Nick Wright | 65.13% (64) | 51.97% (313) | +13.2 | Less Accurate |
| 11John Middlekauff | 66.53% (42) | 54.03% (63) | +12.5 | Less Accurate |
| 12Pat Fitzmaurice | 73.62% (29) | 62.69% (95) | +10.9 | Less Accurate |
| 13Richard Sherman | 66.15% (36) | 56.41% (101) | +9.7 | Less Accurate |
| 14Danny Parkins | 60.15% (15) | 55.1% (82) | +5 | Less Accurate |
| 15Gregg Rosenthal | 62.81% (74) | 60.15% (241) | +2.7 | Same Accuracy |
| 16Rich Eisen | 61.38% (99) | 60.57% (361) | +0.8 | Same Accuracy |
| 17Peter Schrager | 71.36% (14) | 71.58% (34) | -0.2 | Same Accuracy |
| 18Jeff Kerr | 80.39% (31) | 80.95% (152) | -0.6 | Same Accuracy |
| 19JP Acosta | 57.47% (22) | 60.87% (118) | -3.4 | Same Accuracy |
| 20Colin Cowherd | 54.19% (63) | 57.91% (351) | -3.7 | Same Accuracy |
| 21Matt Miller | 75.94% (10) | 85.69% (42) | -9.7 | More Accurate |
| 22Tyler Sullivan | 49% (18) | 59.59% (61) | -10.6 | More Accurate |
| 23Marcus Mosher | 76.72% (48) | 88.25% (29) | -11.5 | More Accurate |
| 24Bucky Brooks | 69.72% (16) | 82.13% (101) | -12.4 | More Accurate |
| 25Daniel Jeremiah | 61.69% (42) | 75.42% (234) | -13.7 | More Accurate |
How often they hedge
The share of each pundit’s claims that carried a hedge, averaged by article like every number on this site, for pundits with at least 30 claims read. The kinds: leans (“probably”, “likely”); possibilities (“could”, “might”); long shots (“wouldn’t shock me”); toss-ups (“50-50”); conditions (“if he stays healthy”).
| Pundit | Hedged | Claims read | Kinds |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26Chad Jensen | 52.19% | 71 | leans 26, possibilities 5, conditions 4, long shots 1 |
| 27Cody Rourke | 51.79% | 32 | leans 5, possibilities 2, conditions 1 |
| 28Pete Martuneac | 51.14% | 32 | leans 10, possibilities 2, conditions 2 |
| 29Rob Rang | 50.83% | 105 | leans 13, possibilities 6, conditions 2, long shots 1 |
| 30Patricia Traina | 50.78% | 101 | leans 15, possibilities 9, conditions 2, long shots 1 |
| 31Bill Huber | 50.62% | 174 | leans 27, possibilities 16, conditions 11 |
| 32Jim Moorman | 50.6% | 30 | leans 7, possibilities 5, conditions 1 |
| 33Gene Chamberlain | 50% | 41 | leans 18, conditions 2 |
| 34Chris Clark | 50% | 38 | leans 11, possibilities 6, conditions 2 |
| 35Jerry Markarian | 49.97% | 63 | leans 8, conditions 5, possibilities 3 |
| 36Henry McKenna | 49.76% | 64 | leans 15, possibilities 9, conditions 3, toss-ups 1 |
| 37Jason La Canfora | 49.24% | 40 | leans 10, possibilities 4, conditions 1, long shots 1 |
| 38Albert Breer | 49% | 80 | leans 16, possibilities 9, long shots 3, conditions 2 |
| 39Peter Bukowski | 48.61% | 82 | leans 21, possibilities 8, conditions 5, long shots 3 |
| 40Bradley Locker | 48.22% | 73 | leans 21, possibilities 20, long shots 2, conditions 1 |
| 41Ralph Vacchiano | 48.04% | 121 | leans 26, possibilities 19, conditions 9, long shots 1 |
| 42Ross Jackson | 47.75% | 354 | leans 34, possibilities 27, conditions 9, long shots 4 |
| 43Christian Booher | 47.56% | 96 | leans 5, possibilities 5, conditions 1 |
| 44Charlie Campbell | 46.91% | 1001 | possibilities 86, leans 43, conditions 7, long shots 1 |
| 45Thomas Martinez | 46.33% | 95 | leans 16, possibilities 7 |
| 46Greg Auman | 46.25% | 67 | leans 17, conditions 11, possibilities 7, long shots 1 |
| 47Tom Strachan | 45.88% | 105 | conditions 13, possibilities 10, leans 8, long shots 2 |
| 48Jay Morrison | 45.3% | 61 | leans 6, conditions 1 |
| 49Lane Mills | 43.77% | 38 | leans 8, possibilities 3, conditions 2, long shots 1 |
| 50Tyler Sullivan | 43.6% | 208 | leans 27, possibilities 20, long shots 11, conditions 9 |
How a hedge is read, and why a hedged call is still graded as the call it wraps: the methodology, Amendment 21.