How often NFL pundits hedge — and whether their hedges land
A hedge is the “probably”, the “could”, the “I wouldn’t be surprised if” wrapped around a call. We grade the call inside it either way. This page counts how often each pundit hedges, and compares how often their hedged calls and their plain calls come true. As of 2026-10-11.
- Pundits listed
- 171
- Claims hedged
- 23.2%
- Hedges undersell them
- 14
- Doubt was real
- 12
30+ claims read
across those pundits
right more often hedging
right more often committing
Hedged calls against plain calls
Hedging against accuracy
Also here: Brendon Nelson · Hedged 56.25% of 35 claims read
Also here: Rafael Zamorano · Hedged 33.95% of 65 claims read
Also here: Jeremy Pargo · Hedged 0% of 33 claims read
How often pundits hedge
Pundits in each band
Are they right more often when they hedge?
Accuracy on graded hedged calls against graded plain ones, for every pundit with at least 10 of the first and 20 of the second. Without hedging says whether their plain calls are more or less accurate than their hedged ones — “Same Accuracy” when the two are within five points. The gap is amber where the hedged calls land more often, blue where the plain ones do, gray inside those five points.
| Pundit | Hedged | Plain | Gap | Without hedging |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1John Breech | 92.59% (11) | 48.97% (108) | +43.6 | Less Accurate |
| 2Alain Poupart | 100% (10) | 71.98% (81) | +28 | Less Accurate |
| 3Albert Breer | 76.08% (10) | 51.79% (23) | +24.3 | Less Accurate |
| 4Manti Te'o | 58.33% (10) | 35.5% (55) | +22.8 | Less Accurate |
| 5David Harrison | 80.98% (13) | 60.67% (222) | +20.3 | Less Accurate |
| 6Chris Brockman | 73.29% (56) | 55.16% (229) | +18.1 | Less Accurate |
| 7Kyle Brandt | 72.81% (14) | 55.06% (91) | +17.8 | Less Accurate |
| 8Ross Jackson | 69.77% (38) | 53.23% (194) | +16.5 | Less Accurate |
| 9Andrew Erickson | 72.82% (23) | 58.26% (79) | +14.6 | Less Accurate |
| 10Nick Wright | 65.13% (64) | 51.97% (313) | +13.2 | Less Accurate |
| 11John Middlekauff | 66.53% (42) | 54.03% (63) | +12.5 | Less Accurate |
| 12Pat Fitzmaurice | 73.62% (29) | 62.69% (95) | +10.9 | Less Accurate |
| 13Richard Sherman | 66.15% (36) | 56.41% (101) | +9.7 | Less Accurate |
| 14Danny Parkins | 60.15% (15) | 55.1% (82) | +5 | Less Accurate |
| 15Gregg Rosenthal | 62.81% (74) | 60.15% (241) | +2.7 | Same Accuracy |
| 16Rich Eisen | 61.38% (99) | 60.57% (361) | +0.8 | Same Accuracy |
| 17Peter Schrager | 71.36% (14) | 71.58% (34) | -0.2 | Same Accuracy |
| 18Jeff Kerr | 80.39% (31) | 80.95% (152) | -0.6 | Same Accuracy |
| 19JP Acosta | 57.47% (22) | 60.87% (118) | -3.4 | Same Accuracy |
| 20Colin Cowherd | 54.19% (63) | 57.91% (351) | -3.7 | Same Accuracy |
| 21Matt Miller | 75.94% (10) | 85.69% (42) | -9.7 | More Accurate |
| 22Tyler Sullivan | 49% (18) | 59.59% (61) | -10.6 | More Accurate |
| 23Marcus Mosher | 76.72% (48) | 88.25% (29) | -11.5 | More Accurate |
| 24Bucky Brooks | 69.72% (16) | 82.13% (101) | -12.4 | More Accurate |
| 25Daniel Jeremiah | 61.69% (42) | 75.42% (234) | -13.7 | More Accurate |
How often they hedge
The share of each pundit’s claims that carried a hedge, averaged by article like every number on this site, for pundits with at least 30 claims read. The kinds: leans (“probably”, “likely”); possibilities (“could”, “might”); long shots (“wouldn’t shock me”); toss-ups (“50-50”); conditions (“if he stays healthy”).
| Pundit | Hedged | Claims read | Kinds |
|---|---|---|---|
| 51Jeff Kerr | 42.7% | 363 | leans 53, possibilities 13, conditions 11, long shots 4 |
| 52Derek Brown | 42.64% | 483 | leans 67, possibilities 55, conditions 34, long shots 12, toss-ups 1 |
| 53Doug Joubert | 42.59% | 83 | leans 11, conditions 2 |
| 54Sayre Bedinger | 42.58% | 42 | leans 4, possibilities 4, conditions 1 |
| 55John Middlekauff | 42.08% | 234 | leans 53, possibilities 19, conditions 15, long shots 7 |
| 56Alain Poupart | 41.03% | 186 | leans 27, conditions 5, possibilities 2, toss-ups 1 |
| 57Donnie Druin | 41% | 76 | leans 12, conditions 11, possibilities 10 |
| 58Josh Edwards | 40.81% | 135 | leans 15, possibilities 8, conditions 3 |
| 59Zachary Pereles | 40.12% | 141 | leans 26, possibilities 10, conditions 6, long shots 2 |
| 60Andrew Erickson | 40.11% | 265 | leans 38, possibilities 22, conditions 19, long shots 2 |
| 61Daniel Wade | 39.64% | 51 | leans 9, possibilities 7, long shots 1 |
| 62Ryan Wormeli | 39.41% | 31 | conditions 9, leans 3, possibilities 1, long shots 1 |
| 63Mike Fanelli | 39.02% | 197 | leans 37, possibilities 23, long shots 16, conditions 5 |
| 64Lance Zierlein | 38.58% | 87 | leans 11, possibilities 10, conditions 4, toss-ups 1, long shots 1 |
| 65Matt Severance | 38.46% | 31 | leans 11, conditions 2 |
| 66Chris Welsh | 38.43% | 50 | leans 3, conditions 3, possibilities 1 |
| 67Joe Pisapia | 37.65% | 40 | leans 8, possibilities 2, conditions 2 |
| 68Matt Miller | 37.03% | 67 | leans 10, possibilities 5, conditions 1, long shots 1 |
| 69Garrett Podell | 36.86% | 65 | leans 14, possibilities 7, conditions 3 |
| 70Randy Gurzi | 36.82% | 143 | possibilities 11, leans 10, conditions 1 |
| 71Dan Patrick | 36.67% | 31 | leans 8, possibilities 4, long shots 1 |
| 72Chad Ochocinco Johnson | 36.11% | 74 | possibilities 11, leans 8, conditions 5, long shots 3 |
| 73Matt Verderame | 36.11% | 41 | leans 5, possibilities 2, conditions 1 |
| 74Ollie Connolly | 36.06% | 35 | leans 9, possibilities 4, conditions 1 |
| 75Peter Schrager | 35.28% | 59 | leans 10, possibilities 7, conditions 2 |
How a hedge is read, and why a hedged call is still graded as the call it wraps: the methodology, Amendment 21.